In our age of Quantitative Easing (a.k.a. money printing)
there is an ideological trend towards sound money. These
recent Inflationary policies enacted by the Federal Reserve have led a lot of
conservative-minded people to vilify Fiat Currencies and call for a return to
the Gold Standard. So, what does the Austrian School of Economics
have to say on the subject?
Many laymen economists point to the “intrinsic value” of
gold as a reason for the return to the Gold Standard. The arguments go like this: “Fiat Currency is
nothing but paper. Gold has an intrinsic value.” While this is a true statement
and perhaps even a good argument in favor of the Gold Standard, this is not necessarily
the Austrian view on the subject.
In A Free-Market
Monetary System, Fredrick Hayek argues in favor of the Gold Standard, but
not for the reason many might expect. In
his mind, Fiat Currency is not the problem; government inflating the supply of
Fiat Currencies is the problem. Gold,
on the other hand, has a fairly constant value because its quantity is limited
to the amount of gold in existence. But
the same could be true of a Fiat Currency; if a paper currency has a constant
supply, it could be a fairly consistent store of value just like gold.
So if Fiat Currency isn't the problem, what is? According to Hayek, unreasonable
governments are the problem. He writes, “Government
will behave reasonably only if it is forced to do so”. The
problem with Fiat Currency is that it doesn’t force the government to act reasonably;
they can print as much of it as they want.
The reason he advocates the Gold Standard is because, “The gold standard
is the only method we have yet found to place a discipline on government”
(pg.11).
So is a government backed Gold Standard the best
solution? Not necessarily, according to
Hayek. It’s certainly better than the “Quantitatively
Eased” US Dollar. But the ultimate
solution is the free-market. If the
government didn’t have a monopoly on money creation, free-enterprises would be
able to make competitive Fiat Currencies.
They would have a competitive reason to keep the supply of their
currencies constant, and thus solve the problem of unreasonable governments
over-printing our money.
No comments:
Post a Comment